Last
week an older white womon business acquaintance, a strate professional I’ve
known for several decades, asked, the first time ever, to meet for coffee. She
wanted to talk with me about feminism and the transiarchy (I’m using this play
on patriarchy as it is more accurate than transdomination). In the course of
our three hour conversation, she got that hallowed shining glaze, misted in
wistfulness, (she wasn’t one of the lucky ones who came out) we all get when
remembering our empowering connection with womyn (beginning with our own
selves) in womyn-only spaces. She literally pulsated deep vibrant joy as she
confessed that the times she went to a womyn-only conference were the very best
times of her whole entire seven plus decades of life.
This
past February, at a meeting of a larger group of womyn, I heard the same passionate
declaration and fervored acknowledgement of what some of these womyn had personally
gained, that all womyn know and receive, from gathering together over the
decades as womyn! Yet those same voices who had reaped so much in the past were
now not just challenging the validity and sanctity of womyn-only spaces but
were helping to destroy them.
It
kinda felt to me like those womyn who are soooooo grateful they had earlier
access to a legal abortion but are now suddenly undermining that access by
being pro-fetus and anti-womyn’s rights. Or people who are soooooo grateful
they are strong and healthy after decades of eating organic but are now
suddenly weakening that health by becoming pro-monsanto adding gmo food to
their diet.
One
of the womyn, who was present at this February meeting, later attended the
ensuing May conference where we were committed to finalizing the division into
two groups in order to meet the incompatible needs of those womyn who value
womon-only space and those who value including men who identify as womyn.
The
conference over, the details of the split finalized, we were preparing to leave
when this womon approached me in the parking lot, asking me if she could tell
me something. I don’t recall ever having a conversation with her previously
although I had learned her name earlier in the week. I was in the process of
loading my truck, soaking in the hot Georgia sun, but paused to smile openly,
listen, curious.
She
asked me if I knew what she appreciated about me. Of course, delightfully, my
ego sent me right to my truck, pondering which one of the messages I’ve chosen,
painted on my truck, and worked so hard to spread around the country does she
appreciate.
My
mind then flies to maybe she appreciates the fact that I’m brilliant,
out-spoken, beautiful, fierce, kind, able to negotiate and communicate with the
‘other’ as well as everyone in-between. Or sexy – we are at a formerly lesbian
conference after all. Or that I’ve done such an excellent job raising my
daughter (although I had good material to work with!). Or how skilled I am at
so many things.
Or
maybe, as we are at a writers’ conference, what a great inspiring writer I am.
So
I meet her, smiling and let her know I’d love to hear what she appreciates
about me.
“I
appreciate that you were peaceful.”
What
the fuck? Are you fucking kidding me? I felt like I was sucker punched. At the
time I could only tell her how insulting she was being, how angry that made me.
Me,
peaceful – as if I haven’t spent my life conflict-solving, using my words,
walking away when I felt like beating the shit outta somebody, figuring out how
to speak many complicated languages so I can competently communicate with
others. As if I haven’t spent decades learning how to see clearly, my biases,
my failings, my strengths – and those of others – so I can successfully
mediate, arbitrate, problem-solve.
I
asked into her stony silence, why would she ever think I would not be ‘peaceful’?
But
‘peaceful’ is like ‘inclusion’ – these terms used for and laced with not-so
hidden values of control over and silencing others.
She
claimed I wasn’t ‘peaceful’ at the previous planning meeting. Really, fuckin
REALLY! I wouldn’t and couldn’t ask her what the hell I did that she
interpreted as violent. I knew. I didn’t throw any chairs, I didn’t shout, I
didn’t punch anyone or threaten any of those anti-peaceful behaviors like rape
and death. My mere verbal opposition to including men who identify as womyn was
interpreted by her as ‘violence.’ Not a surprise as womyn who have the nerve to
embrace biology are framed by transiarchy as ‘more violent than men’, including
the men who are killing them. (Of course their murders are our fault.)
I
understand more now. She fears my womon’s fierce rage and is shamed by my challenging
the injustice of destroying womyn’s sovereignty. Thus she experiences me as
‘violent’.
But
her choosing to fling this ‘peaceful’ charge at me is worse than just an
attempt at control. It is the Orwellian fabrication of who is really violent
and who is the target of that violence.
I
have never threatened to rape anyone, yet I’ve been raped in the past and recently
threatened by transiarchy minions with rape. I have never threatened to beat up
anyone, yet I’ve been beaten up in the past and again threatened by transiarchy
minions in the present with male violence. I have never told anyone to shut up,
yet I’ve been silenced by those of the transiarchy who have more power than my
singular voice.
I
have never doused my t-shirt with blood and painted on it “KILL ALL TRANS”. I’ve
never promoted any kind of violence against trans people or their allies, yet
the reality is that the transiarchy segment at the top of the trans community
has both threatened and perpetrated violence against lesbians and womyn who
refuse to capitulate to transiarchy, who believe biology and know gender is a
tool of the racist, sexist patriarchy.
Her
‘peaceful’ statement hit me hard and I wondered if she would approach a womon
battered and beaten, then praise her for her ‘peaceful’ silence; or approach an
imprisoned bloodied person and praise her for her ‘peaceful’ cooperation with
her jailer.
I’ve
never hit anyone, not even when angry or frustrated raising my child, goddess
children, or anyone’s children. I’ve never threatened anyone with a gun, a
broken bottle, a fist – as I have been threatened with and more, hurt.
I’ve
spoken my truth – and this womon who has claimed she has grown so much, has
been given so much from female sovereign spaces, has experienced my truth as
violence.
But
worse, she is incapable of seeing the true life perpetrators of transiarchy
violence. Not just against me and not just recently. Only more Orwellian and
frequent recently.
5 Comments:
At 9/6/19 4:50 PM, Mz Ida said…
I appreciate your creation of the term transiarchy...I very much agree with you that trans ideology and their many strategies for domination of all things female make it more than just domination. Trans domination tho powerful hides the brutality of the effort they are exerting. They want a global Trans Empire!
At 9/6/19 4:51 PM, Mz Ida said…
I appreciate your creation of the term transiarchy...I very much agree with you that trans ideology and their many strategies for domination of all things female make it more than just domination. Trans domination tho powerful hides the brutality of the effort they are exerting. They want a global Trans Empire!
At 12/6/19 9:32 AM, Anonymous said…
"Who believe biology and know gender is a tool of the racist, sexist patriarchy."
as if Biology hasn't been a tool to oppress Black people and womyn? (& also used in the service of ableism,ageism, classism & fatphobia, etc.) Because it has.
Your fear of Trans-take over sounds akin to fears of people of color--Black masculinty in particular in relation to white womyn.
I read that you are saying that trans womyn are not real womyn.Who gets to decide? You?
You say you work against patriarchy & racism, that you are a peace activist, but your language sounds fearful,anger driven and very masculine.
You have scapegoated another oppressed and marginalized group by creating this phrase "transiarchy" and made them out to be some empowered, overlord, organized group, while actually, they're being murdered---more often as trans womyn of color.
Or do you only see selectively?
How can you proclaim to work against different -isms, but you are exclusionary. How does that work?
You sound paranoid and afraid at the least and trans hating like Trump at the worst, focused on bathroom politics of other people deciding bodies for them.
you likely won't publish this because it disagrees with you, but hopefully, you will see it.
At 11/9/19 1:48 AM, Anonymous said…
Its like you read my mind! You seem to know so much about this,
like you wrote the book in it or something. I think that you could do with
some pics to drive the message home a bit, but instead of that, this is fantastic blog.
A fantastic read. I'll definitely be back.
At 11/9/19 5:20 AM, Anonymous said…
When I originally commented I clicked the "Notify me when new comments are added" checkbox
and now each time a comment is added I get four emails with
the same comment. Is there any way you can remove me from that service?
Many thanks!
Post a Comment
<< Home